quote:
You should be able to conceptualize an idea that is not your own. Yes that's what I'm asking you to do. It's what intelligent people are able to do.

You are asking me to do your homework. And calling me unintelligent because you can't communicate and back up YOUR opinion. That's a huge argumentative fallacy.

quote:
You can compare things that aren't exactly the same. Every single comparison ever has a flaw. I've recognized the flaw in that comparison and openly acknowledged it yet you keep thinking I'm arguing the flaw when I'm not.

You are saying they are not comparable yet using the result of comparing them as equals as proof of your argument. You are simply taking the parts of the comparison you like and using those while ignoring th aspects of the comparison that prove your argument irrelevant. That is the definiton of contradiction.

quote:
So now we're changing the criteria.

No we never changed the criteria. You chose kobe to compare him to and that situation is not the same as Kyries potiential situation with the Knicks nor is his star level anywhere near Kobes. The criteria is the same but the criteria doesn't make any sense as plenty of people have pointed out to you.

quote:
I can't keep explaining this over and over.

At some point you have to start blaming your self instead of everyone else.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Weagle25

THE Football State.

Member since Oct 2011

46274 posts

Posted on 7/28/17 at 1:06 pm to wildtigercat93

quote:
You are asking me to do your homework

I'm not asking you to do any work besides comprehend an idea

quote:
And calling me unintelligent because you can't communicate and back up YOUR opinion.

First of all I never called you unintelligent. You were acting like it was lunacy for me to ask you conceptualize an idea.

I'm not even asking you to agree with my opinion. I'm trying to get you to understand where my argument is coming from which apparently is useless. Ever since we've established that there is a threshold for immunity, I've chalked the rest up to difference of opinion.

quote:
You are saying they are not comparable

Again. Reading comprehension. I never said that. Just because there's a flaw in the comparison doesn't mean they aren't comparable. Like I said, every single comparison ever has a flaw. Doesn't mean it's not useful.

quote:
You are simply taking the parts of the comparison you like and using those while ignoring th aspects of the comparison that prove your argument irrelevant.

I'm not ignoring them. IVE OPENLY RECOGNIZED THE PARTS THAT DO NOT SUPPORT MY ARGUMENT MANY TIMES. I do not feel they out weigh the parts that do support my argument. You feel differently. It's a difference of opinion. Not a contradiction.

quote:
No we never changed the criteria. You chose kobe to compare him to and that situation is not the same as Kyries potiential situation with the Knicks nor is his star level anywhere near Kobes. The criteria is the same but the criteria doesn't make any sense as plenty of people have pointed out to you.

There's only been one person to argue this aspect and you didn't even argue it. The criteria has been and still is when was Kobe on a bad team. He's been on more than one bad team.