Started By
Message
locked post

Trump changes his "Drain the Swamp" motto/Blasts Democrats

Posted on 7/24/17 at 5:54 am
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 5:54 am
"Drain the Swamp should be changed to Drain the Sewer - it's actually much worse than anyone ever thought, and it begins with the Fake News!"

After 1 year of investigation with Zero evidence being found, Chuck Schumer just stated that "Democrats should blame ourselves,not Russia."

It's going to be an exciting week, folks!
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 6:03 am
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
46905 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 5:58 am to
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
48737 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:14 am to
I love it when Our President comes out swinging!


Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39175 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:43 am to
quote:

"Drain the Swamp should be changed to Drain the Sewer - it's actually much worse than anyone ever thought
You might begin by stop surrounding yourself with your establishment cronies?

No, this is just an excuse for doing nothing about it, which I'm sure the Trumpophants will view as WINNING!
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:44 am to
It's a little too early for a meltdown bro
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
7053 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:45 am to
quote:

Drain the Swamp should be changed to Drain the Sewer - it's actually much worse than anyone ever thought, and it begins with the Fake News


Trump hates the fake news so much he gave an exclusive interview to the new York times last week...he gave them yuge huge revenue.

He hates them so much he made them money! That will learn them!
This post was edited on 7/24/17 at 6:47 am
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:47 am to
You mean the same NYT that threatened national security and leaked top secret information on the location of ISIS leader?
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39175 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:48 am to
quote:

It's a little too early for a meltdown bro
Well, it's been 104 years. How much longer should I wait it out?
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:49 am to
7 1/2 years
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39175 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Drain the Swamp should be changed to Drain the Sewer - it's actually much worse than anyone ever thought, and it begins with the Fake News



Trump hates the fake news so much he gave an exclusive interview to the new York times last week...he gave them yuge huge revenue.

He hates them so much he made them money! That will learn them!


And the media is so against Trump that they gave him 24/7 access and made sure to keep his brand at the forefront during his campaign.
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
7053 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:51 am to
quote:

You mean the same NYT that threatened national security and leaked top secret information on the location of ISIS leader?


You mean an unsourced article with no evidence or authority to verify that claim that relates to this topic?
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:54 am to
That's a pathetic argument. You would think that 93% NEGATIVE coverage on Trump since the inauguration would make it clear of the obvious media bias. And they talked about his "brand" during the campaign because he actually HAS a brand. Give a solid argument next time.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39175 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:55 am to
quote:

It's a little too early for a meltdown bro


Well, it's been 104 years. How much longer should I wait it out?


7 1/2 years

Great, and then the blind followers of the next establishment puppet can tell me the same thing the Obamabots and Trumpophants said before them.

More of the same....Can't wait.

Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 6:57 am to
NYT has zero credibility, and if you haven't figured it out by now, Trump trolls TF out of the media. It is relevant to this topic because a top general in the military said the NYT leak prohibited them to do their job. That's all the information I need
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:00 am to
Explain blind follower? I don't think securing the border, bringing back jobs, supporting the military, and tax cuts are "blindly following." When it comes to Russia, ZERO evidence has been brought to the table, so why should I believe anything the media says?
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39175 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:06 am to
quote:

That's a pathetic argument. You would think that 93% NEGATIVE coverage on Trump since the inauguration would make it clear of the obvious media bias. And they talked about his "brand" during the campaign because he actually HAS a brand.
Compare what the media did to Ron Paul's campaign - killing it by muffling it while simultaneously demonizing it with no chance for rebuttal - to Trump's campaign - purposely building it to rock star status by plastering his brand 24/7, giving him full access to rail on his critics and the establishment.

The media is fully aware of how to kill a campaign (Ron Paul) and how to build one up (Obama, now Trump).

It went about it (Obama/Trump) in opposite ways because that's what the times called for. But on both occasions it fooled people into believing that somebody new and different was going to change the way the establishment had been running things previously.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39175 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:10 am to
quote:

When it comes to Russia, ZERO evidence has been brought to the table, so why should I believe anything the media says?
You're making my point.

The media exists to confuse and distract. So why would you believe them when they tell you 24/7 that Trump is anti-establishment?
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20931 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:16 am to
Two COMPLETELY different candidates. Now, keep in mind, I was a first time voter in 2016, but have done my research and have been incredibly involved throughout the process. Trump did something Paul couldn't, which is not give a frick at all. He ran on American values (evident in old Obama/new Trump voters in previously blue states). He directly called out bullshite news stories, and the people didn't believe the polls (good thing).

Trump is a once in a lifetime candidate. I'm 21 years old, no Twitter, Facebook, or Instagram. The media TRIED to kill Trumps campaign(Access Hollywood) and Trump went passed them. Don't blame Trump for doing the impossible, blame Paul or the media for not figuring it out.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39175 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:24 am to
quote:

Now, keep in mind, I was a first time voter in 2016,
Take it from someone who's seen these tactics used over and over and over and over again ad nauseam - Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.

quote:

Trump is a once in a lifetime candidate. I'm 21 years old
You've got a lot to learn.

quote:

The media TRIED to kill Trumps campaign(Access Hollywood) and Trump went passed them. Don't blame Trump for doing the impossible, blame Paul or the media for not figuring it out.
Try reading and comprehending what I've posted in this thread.
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
39175 posts
Posted on 7/24/17 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Two COMPLETELY different candidates.
I couldn't agree more. Ron Paul had a 30-year record of unwavering anti-establishment, America-first.

Trump has a 70-year record of establishment cronyism.

We agree, two COMPLETELY different candidates.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram