- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff: The Commonwealth Fund Healthcare 2017 rankings. US basically ranked last
Posted on 7/20/17 at 2:01 pm to WaWaWeeWa
Posted on 7/20/17 at 2:01 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
So I just did the math (we order 109 MRIs per 1,000 Americans) and if we saved $400 on each MRI we would save 13.9 billion.
Do you know how many MRIs there are in Canada?
Around 180
Know how many MRIs there are in California? Around 1500
You're looking at one slice of data. Medicare and Medicaid already get rock bottom pricing on a lot of things. There's not blood coming out of a stone. And I'm conflating a number of different facets of the argument, I'm aware. But you're not saving $14B on drug pricing. And you're not saving half of that on imaging by "better negotiations." You may succeed in forcing them to charge other countries more money. Not sure that helps us as much as we pretend it will.
1
Posted on 7/20/17 at 2:19 pm to the808bass
quote:
Do you know how many MRIs there are in Canada? Around 180 Know how many MRIs there are in California? Around 1500
More people live in California than Canada
Your statistic doesn't prove anything. We order 109 MRIs per 1,000 patients they order 54 per 100,000. That's the number that matters.
But why do we pay so much more for a single MRI in the US?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News