quote:
Now how in the hell is the Saban era SEC west shite compared to the SEC west now with an extra team boosting their win pct and it's still only 2% better?

because 60 % of Saban's tenure never had a west team with less than 3 losses. good god bruh must stop.

Saban at lsu faced 2 west teams that finished top 10.
from 2011-2015 miles faced 9 teams that finished top 10.

during Saban's entire tenure he faced 1 west team that finished in the top 5.
miles faced 2 west teams that finished top 5 in 2011 alone.

the fact that you're attempting this argument when Saban never once faced a national title PARTICIPANT is astounding.

AGAIN, FROM 2000-2002( 60% OF SABAN'S TENURE) 88% OF THE ENTIRE WEST HAD 4 LOSSES OR MORE.

Saban faced 1 west team that finished top 5.
from 2011-2015 miles faced 6 west teams that finished top 5.

in 60% of Saban's tenure the west winner had 3 losses or more

in Mile's entire tenure the west winner had more than 2 losses zero times.

just stop.

This post was edited on 7/14/17 at 11:07 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Madking

Member since Apr 2016

48391 posts

Posted on 7/14/17 at 11:27 pm to Rickdaddy4188

Dude I just gave you the god damn win percentages and you're still gonna argue against the facts. I don't care about the emphasis you put on x amount of losses or opinionated rankings those are subjective taking points. All you're saying is that a top heavy league is better in your opinion than a league that's good 1-6. The fricking win pct, the indisputable evidence is exactly the same. Unbelievable especially for you. You're taking two groups with the exact same data and saying one is better than the other because you say so. That's the definition of bias.

This post was edited on 7/14/17 at 11:52 pm

4 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board