Started By
Message

re: Senate announces probe of Loretta Lynch behavior in 2016 election

Posted on 6/23/17 at 12:37 pm to
Posted by HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
Member since Feb 2017
12458 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Sounds like there is very possibly a case of obstruction that could be made here...certainly as strong if not stronger than any such case against Trump.



No there isn't. Loretta Lynch could have told the FBI to stop investigating, just the same as Trump could. See how the chain of command works?


Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

No there isn't. Loretta Lynch could have told the FBI to stop investigating, just the same as Trump could


Isn't there a difference in telling someone to end an investigation and actively trying to obstruct one?
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26999 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

No there isn't. Loretta Lynch could have told the FBI to stop investigating, just the same as Trump could. See how the chain of command works?






Chain of command? So you're suggesting Obama be indicted.

According to Comey, did Trump say...quoting you..."stop investigating"? No.

We'll see where the investigations lead, but if Lynch obstructed justice, she should be prosecuted.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43480 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 12:46 pm to
Nevermind. Read that shite all wrong.
This post was edited on 6/23/17 at 12:49 pm
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99684 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay


It's hilarious how hard you are trying to hide how worried you are right now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram