- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Republicans want to know why Comey didn’t write memo about Lynch | TheHill
Posted on 6/11/17 at 3:47 pm to PepeSilvia
Posted on 6/11/17 at 3:47 pm to PepeSilvia
quote:
It's typically a good idea to document official encounters with pathological liars.
yet Comey never documented confirmed pathelogical liars Obama, Hilliary, Holder and Lynch...
Posted on 6/11/17 at 3:57 pm to LSURulzSEC
Maybe he thought the level of dishonesty from Trump was significantly higher, or that Trump was a particularly vindictive variety of charlatan.
Maybe he assumed a liar the likes of Trump was bound to be under intense legal scrutiny, and documentation proper as an affiliate.
Honestly, the poliboard is going to run with whatever narrative Rush, Savage, Levine or Fox dictates to them. If you don't have cable and are having difficulty drawing your own conclusions, just wait until the EIB is back from the weekend break.
Maybe he assumed a liar the likes of Trump was bound to be under intense legal scrutiny, and documentation proper as an affiliate.
Honestly, the poliboard is going to run with whatever narrative Rush, Savage, Levine or Fox dictates to them. If you don't have cable and are having difficulty drawing your own conclusions, just wait until the EIB is back from the weekend break.
Posted on 6/11/17 at 3:57 pm to Reubaltaich
quote:
He was paid off by the clintons years ago to look the other way with their pardon of marc rich.
marc rich should have been doing life in prison but the sleazy clintons, a low level DOJ flunky named comey let marc rich off scott-free.
comey got a HUGE payoff with a cushy job at Lockheed Martin.
What else can you dream up to blame Comey for?
What about him re-instating the "investigation" of Clinton 10 days before the election?
Was that his fault too?
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:00 pm to PepeSilvia
What is all of that shite?
If one administration pressuring him on an investigation was good enough to illicit a memo, why was another not?
If one administration pressuring him on an investigation was good enough to illicit a memo, why was another not?
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:06 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Because he didn't think Lynch would systematically lie about the interaction in the way that he knew Trump would/has.
And you are apparently dumb enough to think Lynch and Clinton talked about kids and golf when they met on the tarmac.
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:11 pm to Vacherie Saint
One was about messaging, not expressing a desire to end an investigation. Definitely an improper discussion, but optically less damaging...unless, of course, you are a Trump supporter.
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:19 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Because it wasn't a private meeting. Lots of witnesses.
So what? Who were some of the others?
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:20 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Because he didn't think Lynch would systematically lie about the interaction in the way that he knew Trump would/has.
That makes no sense.
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:21 pm to PepeSilvia
Get that weak shite out of here, muchacho.
Asking the director of the fbi not to tell the American people that a potential white collar criminal is under investigation so she can win the white house goes far beyond "messaging". Comey obviously thought so, since he decided not to "die on that hill".
Meanwhile, the same fbi director decided that the American people didn't deserve to know that their president was NOT being investigation for fricking treason -- even as propaganda flowed, legislation stalled, and foreign governments were responding in ways that hurt our country.
By all means, shill - but at least be a little honest about it.
Asking the director of the fbi not to tell the American people that a potential white collar criminal is under investigation so she can win the white house goes far beyond "messaging". Comey obviously thought so, since he decided not to "die on that hill".
Meanwhile, the same fbi director decided that the American people didn't deserve to know that their president was NOT being investigation for fricking treason -- even as propaganda flowed, legislation stalled, and foreign governments were responding in ways that hurt our country.
By all means, shill - but at least be a little honest about it.
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:24 pm to cajunangelle
He already said he wrote memos for Trump bc he thought Trump p might lie later. Dont know why this is so confusing for yall
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:26 pm to Bullethead88
Comey was FORCED to do both clinton investigations, or he'd never have done so. His own agents insisted on the first one and he PROMISED Congress he'd tell them about any new developments. He's a pos, just like the clintons and just like YOU.
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:27 pm to Ebbandflow
So you think he was confident that Lynch would tell the world that she pressured the fbi director to not call emailgate an investigation so hrc could more easily win the presidency?
Solid logic.
Solid logic.
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:28 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:Because it's not his job to say that, first of all, and secondly, how stupid would it look to announce that and then have to come back and announce that he now was at some point. You guys would have flipped your shite.
the same fbi director decided that the American people didn't deserve to know that their president was NOT being investigation
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:29 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Hint: Something to do with him giving them to Mueller.
Hint: Wouldn't that be analogous to entering them into record? If not did he think that Mueller would "hide" them? *He probably would*
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:31 pm to PepeSilvia
quote:
Trump has been shown to be a pathological liar.
What are you basing that claim on?
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:31 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Because it's not his job to say that, first of all, and secondly, how stupid would it look to announce that and then have to come back and announce that he now was at some point. You guys would have flipped your shite.
That's exactly what he did with hillary, dumbshit.
Again, why the double standards?
Eta. And you m'f'ers that were screaming bloody murder to see every tax return, court filing, and "tapes" (I'm looking at you, JT) on Trump suddenly don't want to know who the fbi is investigating?
Lulz.
This post was edited on 6/11/17 at 4:35 pm
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:32 pm to PepeSilvia
quote:
Maybe he thought the level of dishonesty from Trump was significantly higher, or that Trump was a particularly vindictive variety of charlatan. Maybe he assumed a liar the likes of Trump was bound to be under intense legal scrutiny, and documentation proper as an affiliate.
That only exists in your mind.
Posted on 6/11/17 at 4:33 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
So you think he was confident that Lynch would tell the world that she pressured the fbi director to not call emailgate an investigation so hrc could more easily win the presidency?
Solid logic.
I have no idea because im not privy to those unknowns and neither is anyone here. All I DO know is what Comey said.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)