- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: TWC vs CNN on Climate change
Posted on 6/7/17 at 12:54 pm to Salmon
Posted on 6/7/17 at 12:54 pm to Salmon
Experts that are expected to return certain results and follow through on that shouldn't be considered experts. It's amazing in court when two experts completely disagree. They always seem to be aligned with the party that is paying them. Same thing with global warming experts...
This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 6/7/17 at 1:24 pm to BBONDS25
quote:Chicken and egg. One tends to hire those that agree with themselves. (Hint: that happens A LOT in academia!)
They always seem to be aligned with the party that is paying them.
What I find entertaining is the belief that government money = 100% always objective impartial results. Any other money = pure tainted results!
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 1:25 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)