Started By
Message

re: TWC vs CNN on Climate change

Posted on 6/7/17 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49017 posts
Posted on 6/7/17 at 12:54 pm to
Experts that are expected to return certain results and follow through on that shouldn't be considered experts. It's amazing in court when two experts completely disagree. They always seem to be aligned with the party that is paying them. Same thing with global warming experts...
This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 12:54 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57517 posts
Posted on 6/7/17 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

They always seem to be aligned with the party that is paying them.
Chicken and egg. One tends to hire those that agree with themselves. (Hint: that happens A LOT in academia!)

What I find entertaining is the belief that government money = 100% always objective impartial results. Any other money = pure tainted results!
This post was edited on 6/7/17 at 1:25 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram