Started By
Message

re: Ranking FBS national champions since 1990

Posted on 6/4/17 at 3:22 pm to
Posted by The Anointed One
Member since Apr 2017
388 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 3:22 pm to
So you are trying to say that USC's offensive players either regressed or stayed the same in 2005

The entire team came back on offense
With this there is no way that the 2004 team was better.
You can look at the 2005 and 2006 draft to see this

Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18988 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 3:33 pm to
His numbers about returning starters were obviously made up but still 05 USC > 04 USC

05 USC D is the extremely underrated they played the

#1 Texas
#5 UCLA
#6 Fresno St
#7 Arizona St
#8 Notre Dame
#12 Oregon
#21 Washington St
#25 Cal

ranked scoring offenses and held all of them except Fresno below their scoring average


Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12827 posts
Posted on 6/4/17 at 3:36 pm to
nobody said usc's offense in 05 wasn't better than in 04, as they all had 1 more year under their belt.

usc 04 offense was an A+, the 05 offense was A++

however, the 04 usc defense was an A, while the 05 defense dropped to a C-

04 was a better overall team, its not debatable. the 05 defense got shredded by other teams not nearly as good as Texas.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram