Started By
Message

re: First human ancestors came from Europe not Africa 7.2 million-year-old fossils indicate

Posted on 5/23/17 at 10:15 pm to
Posted by AbuTheMonkey
Chicago, IL
Member since May 2014
8036 posts
Posted on 5/23/17 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

The idea that humans originated in sub-saharan africa and spread from there never made much sense to me. The sahara desert is nearly the size of the united states. No primitive people were crossing that desert to populate other lands. They would have been cooked and died.



Besides the aforementioned relatively recent desertification of the Sahara, there is far too much genetic diversity within sub-Saharan vis a vis the rest of the world to make anyone seriously think otherwise. The amount of genetic diversity within sub-Saharan Africa is exponentially larger than it is even between the rest of the world.

Plus, all of our closest meaningful genetic relatives are in Africa. That's pretty compelling all on its own.
This post was edited on 5/23/17 at 10:21 pm
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Plus, all of our closest meaningful genetic relatives are in Africa. That's pretty compelling all on its own.


Just because "all of our closest meaningful genetic relatives are in Africa" that isn't absolute proof the ancestors of all human beings came out of Africa.

When evidence is found which even tends to prove that the ancestors of all human beings didn't come out of Africa then we must examine that evidence with an open mind.

Don't you agree?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram