- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Robert E. Lee has been misrepresented by regressive "historians"
Posted on 5/22/17 at 4:06 pm to WhiskeyPapa
Posted on 5/22/17 at 4:06 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
With rifled muskets and on the defense, the Rebels should have simply been unbeatable.
They weren't completely on the defense. They had to expel a bigger force from the south to keep supply lines open. They couldn't just dig in at Richmond. They would have eventually starved.
Posted on 5/22/17 at 4:09 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
With rifled muskets and on the defense, the Rebels should have simply been unbeatable.
They weren't completely on the defense. They had to expel a bigger force from the south to keep supply lines open. They couldn't just dig in at Richmond. They would have eventually starved.
They should have been able to maintain a strategic and operational defense. Float like a butterfly and sting like a bee. But Lee had to attack anything he saw - even Fort Stedman at the very end of his personal misadventure.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)