re: Seth Rich.... for non conspiracy theorists

quote:

---

The best reason to think Rich was the source comes from Wikileaks imo. In an interview Asange described their informant and it basically exactly described Rich. And their twitter account has obviously put his name out there. Wikileaks/Asange have a damn good record of facts, so not sure why we shouldn't believe this?

And the argument that we shouldn't look into this for the family's sake, is bullshite considering this is a national security issue

---

1) Assange is a professional troll. I don't question the veracity of documents he releases. But his record as to insinuation and opinions should not be conflated with the legitimacy of actual materials disseminated.
2) You make all these arguments about how Hannity is full of shite, but then conclusively tell us this is a national security issue?

My problem with "well why don't we investigate it" is that it would be a victory for the trolls. I like how half this board thinks the FBI should be chasing down Hillary, needs to focus on real problems, etc., but wants to see LEO resources poured into pizzagate, Seth Rich and other 4chan shite.