- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: U-verse vs direct tv picture quality
Posted on 5/3/18 at 2:24 pm to BigD45
Posted on 5/3/18 at 2:24 pm to BigD45
If it's a fiber connection you do not have to worry about distance. Vrads are only used on fttn connections not fttp. When using fiber the distance is irrelevant. Everyone connected to the pfp is capable of getting the same speeds.
As far as streams go you only get 6 on fiber, not 12.
Most customers I have installed DirecTV for have told me they feel the picture quality is noticeably better compared to what they had with Cox or even Uverse.
As far as streams go you only get 6 on fiber, not 12.
Most customers I have installed DirecTV for have told me they feel the picture quality is noticeably better compared to what they had with Cox or even Uverse.
1
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:39 am to BottleGnome
quote:
If it's a fiber connection you do not have to worry about distance. Vrads are only used on fttn connections not fttp. When using fiber the distance is irrelevant. Everyone connected to the pfp is capable of getting the same speeds.
As far as streams go you only get 6 on fiber, not 12.
Most customers I have installed DirecTV for have told me they feel the picture quality is noticeably better compared to what they had with Cox or even Uverse.
Good deal! You're the man around here when it comes to the at&t stuff!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News