- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harvard study: 98% of MSM coverage of Trump negative
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:47 am to a want
Posted on 5/19/17 at 8:47 am to a want
quote:
Maybe becausez 98% of what he does in negative
/thread
I'm no Trump supporter or Obama supporter for that matter, but there's no rational person that truly believes that 98% of what Trump has done (which isn't much, frankly) is bad.
It's this kind of partisan bullshite that is killing this country.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 9:14 am to Aubie Spr96
I refuse to believe that he gets 2% positive coverage...number seems way to high
Posted on 5/19/17 at 9:31 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
but there's no rational person that truly believes that 98% of what Trump has done (which isn't much, frankly) is bad.
That isn't the point of the thread it is the coverage of Trump.
He may have done 10 bad things and 10 good things, but as soon as he does a good thing it gets completely overshadowed and lost because of the bad things he is doing.
First, Can you blame the media either? Negative stories have always been a ratings grabber. Just look at your local news. How much time do they spend on crime and disaster stories compared to stories about charities or other good events?
Second, most of the bad coverage is self inflicted.
Posted on 5/19/17 at 12:42 pm to Aubie Spr96
quote:
, but there's no rational person that truly believes that 98% of what Trump has done (which isn't much, frankly) is bad.
"Making libtards melt" and "draining the swamp" aren't real things. What has he done that is objectively good? He has failed on delivering ritually all of his promises (wall, ACA, HRC prosecutor, tear up Iran deal, nafta, Muslim ban, china is currency manipulator...)
Granted, it may not be 2% but it isn't more than 8-10. What are the successes?
This post was edited on 5/19/17 at 12:49 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)