- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Any other Trump voter just ready for a special prosecutor/investigation at this point?
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:40 pm to NIH
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:40 pm to NIH
I think in the interests of transparency, there should be an independent prosecutor. However, it is possible that the appointment of an independent prosecutor could be challenged Constitutionally. It was challenged before, and upheld in Morrison v. Olson. It was challenged on the grounds that Congress's appointment of an independent prosecutor violates separation of powers because it involves the legislative branch taking on executive branch functions outside of proper checks and balances. The practice was upheld, with only Scalia dissenting, but many scholars after the fact have praised Scalia's dissent. It is looked at as prescient, forward looking, and likely legally correct today with the benefit of hindsight. It is very possible that if a similar challenge were to be brought against the Independent Counsel Act that it could be struck down as unconstitutional.
Posted on 5/11/17 at 10:51 pm to kingbob
quote:
I think in the interests of transparency, there should be an independent prosecutor. However, it is possible that the appointment of an independent prosecutor could be challenged Constitutionally. It was challenged before, and upheld in Morrison v. Olson. It was challenged on the grounds that Congress's appointment of an independent prosecutor violates separation of powers because it involves the legislative branch taking on executive branch functions outside of proper checks and balances. The practice was upheld, with only Scalia dissenting, but many scholars after the fact have praised Scalia's dissent. It is looked at as prescient, forward looking, and likely legally correct today with the benefit of hindsight. It is very possible that if a similar challenge were to be brought against the Independent Counsel Act that it could be struck down as unconstitutional.
That's a really weird, wrong, and long winded way of saying that if you're a Trump supporter you're scared shitless of any type of impartial investigation.
Being scared is the one thing Trump supporters are right about.
This post was edited on 5/11/17 at 10:52 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News