- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hats off to U.S. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) for ripping Comey on The Hill
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:52 pm
For a rookie senator, the boy did a pretty good job at making Comey look like the slippery Democrat operative he is - and probably contributed to his demise at least to some degree. LINK
5
Posted on 5/9/17 at 9:56 pm to tigerpawl
I would rather drink weed killer than ever not upvote a JOHN KENNEDY post.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:06 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
anyone who hears that sack of shite comet answer his questions, realzing he is the top of the FBI, and doesn't come to the conclusion he is a lying fricking criminal weasel, is flat out stupid.
He basically said Huma didn't know her husband wasn't cleared to receive top secret emails.
frick me running. I'm embarrassed that the guy is from America.
He basically said Huma didn't know her husband wasn't cleared to receive top secret emails.
frick me running. I'm embarrassed that the guy is from America.
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 7:38 am
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:20 pm to tigerpawl
1,1,1,1,1
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:51 pm to the LSUSaint
Seems like adding criminal intent to classified materials laws essentially negates the classified status, especially when those at the highest level can escape on lack of intent because they didn't know they couldn't do that. Wtf.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 11:12 pm to tigerpawl
What I still don't understand is how could they not prove intent. Every person who holds a clearance has to go through annual training.
The first thing taught is who is authorized to view classified? The answer is (1) does the person have the proper clearance? And (2) Do they have a need to know? This is something everyone knows. If you answer No to either of those questions the person is not authorized...period.
Anyone in the position of Secretary of State or that person's closest assistant KNOWS the rules. The only conclusion one can draw is there was intent!
All anyone had to do was pull up their mandatory security training certificates showing it was completed and you have proven intent. This is not difficult.
The first thing taught is who is authorized to view classified? The answer is (1) does the person have the proper clearance? And (2) Do they have a need to know? This is something everyone knows. If you answer No to either of those questions the person is not authorized...period.
Anyone in the position of Secretary of State or that person's closest assistant KNOWS the rules. The only conclusion one can draw is there was intent!
All anyone had to do was pull up their mandatory security training certificates showing it was completed and you have proven intent. This is not difficult.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 11:13 pm to beerJeep
quote:that woman is nuts. That may be your type.
1,1,1,1,1
Posted on 5/9/17 at 11:15 pm to airfernando
quote:
that woman is nuts. That may be your type.
How do you know what my type is
Yeah....you right though... Except she isn't blonde.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 11:58 pm to PanhandleTigah
quote:
What I still don't understand is how could they not prove intent.
This, but I'll go further. I've had to pay a speeding ticket when I didn't intend to speed. I was in a 55 zone and thought I was in a 70. No intent, but I got the fine anyway.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 7:43 am to PanhandleTigah
quote:
how could they not prove intent.
You don't need intent. That's what's fricked up. She signed documents recognizing what's illegal. Then she did it anyway.
Gross negligence minimum! But on each email. That's thousands of charges.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 7:52 am to tigerpawl
He came off in that exchange like a shill. His phrases were poorly constructed attempts to trap Comey in a corner. There was no nuance to his hypotheticals.
I don't care for Comey, but sheesh...Kennedy looked like an idiot.
I don't care for Comey, but sheesh...Kennedy looked like an idiot.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 8:15 am to PepeSilvia
Kennedy has a great mean/sad face.
Just to be clear, it is more convenient to fwd emails to your husband to print out-then hand deliver to Clinton than it is to hit FWD. got it
Just to be clear, it is more convenient to fwd emails to your husband to print out-then hand deliver to Clinton than it is to hit FWD. got it
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 8:48 am
Posted on 5/10/17 at 8:19 am to tigerfoot
I'm not defending Clinton or Comey in this thread. I find the double standard of law when applied to politicians v. citizens disturbing.
However, a circle jerk over Kennedy is silly. He tried to look clever and failed miserably. He should have, point blank, asked the questions that he wanted answers to. Instead, he threw out lame hypotheticals making him look like a typical showmanship over substance politician.
However, a circle jerk over Kennedy is silly. He tried to look clever and failed miserably. He should have, point blank, asked the questions that he wanted answers to. Instead, he threw out lame hypotheticals making him look like a typical showmanship over substance politician.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 9:07 am to PepeSilvia
so she send him Top Secret documents & he doesn't read them, is complete bull shite. Worst she didn't know his clearance , more bullshite.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 9:13 am to the LSUSaint
quote:
He basically said Huma didn't know her husband wasn't cleared to receive top secret emails.
Huma never sent Weiner classified emails.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 9:27 am to tigerpawl
I still want to know when intent became a determinant in deciding whether someone should be prosecuted over breaking a law.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News