Started By
Message

re: FCC announces plan to reverse Title II net neutrality

Posted on 4/26/17 at 4:59 pm to
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125592 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

I never said it didn't. In fact I agree. I'm saying that keeping NN won't create more competition, and getting rid of NN won't bar entry into the game any worse than what it is already...in fact it could help in that area.
quote:

I never said it didn't. In fact I agree. I'm saying that keeping NN won't create more competition, and getting rid of NN won't bar entry into the game any worse than what it is already...in fact it could help in that area.


what

how can taking NN away, help new start up ISPs or other ISPs enter a new market when the local gov't has been paid off by an ISP? My town is a perfect example. Our only option for high speed internet is Cable One.
Posted by LSU316
Rice and Easy Baby!!!
Member since Nov 2007
29351 posts
Posted on 4/26/17 at 5:03 pm to
In that situation it is difficult....but in a town like Crowley that has no underhanded agreement with some carrier the lack of NN would allow startups to do things with their service that would put them in a unique position to compete for customers that are currently using Cox. This in turn offsets some of the high up front startup costs.

Like I said in order to solve competition issues you have to deregulate at every level.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram