- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anybody Here STILL BELIEVE That Trump's Surveillance Accusation Hasn't Been Proven?
Posted on 4/3/17 at 6:24 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 4/3/17 at 6:24 pm to BamaAtl
quote:Let's be real, here, it wasn't even really his claim. He got it from Fox news about a Breitbart report.
In fact, we've learned beyond a doubt that his claim was a fabrication, like so many of his other claims.
Now anybody that can prove Obama ordered anything, please step on up. Let's end this tired arse story.
1
Posted on 4/3/17 at 6:39 pm to JuiceTerry
It's not tired. It's just beginning. As of now Rice is toast. Lynch and Brennan are next up. Indictments are coming.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 6:42 pm to bencoleman
quote:You may be right, but you might not like the names that are on them.
Indictments are coming.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 6:44 pm to JuiceTerry
We'll see who eats crow first.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 6:56 pm to KCT
quote:
By now, how could even the most ardent anti-Trumper not concede that Trump was right?
Anybody?
I highly doubt it but I wouldn't put anything past any politician....
The "evidence" thus far has been nothing more than a continuation of the original tweet...it has all come from the same place, the white house...saying that is proof is like saying you have proof your wife, who you caught with Jody about 12 inches deep, telling you that she wasn't cheating and offering her telling you that as proof...and you accepting it....
Posted on 4/3/17 at 6:59 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I know it's news to you that the national security advisor would have reason to look at information about one of our political parties rolling over for the Russians, but it's pretty clear to rational people.
and rational people would wonder why they were circulating reports about incidental conversations of the Trump family and staff that had nothing to do with Russian or other foreign intel for over a year. You need to keep up or quit watching the selective news reports.
If we find out that they were monitoring Cruz, Kasich, Rubio or others then what we have here is a "situation"
What we have here is a potential sham investigation that coincidentally monitors the opposing party's candidates. In the 70's Congress drew up Articles of Impeachment against Richard Nixon for similar circumstances. The specific charge was Abuse of Power for using govt sources for investgating his opposition.
This post was edited on 4/3/17 at 7:02 pm
Posted on 4/3/17 at 7:05 pm to GetmorewithLes
quote:
Proof
FOXnews!
Thats one step up from youtube for a source! 
Posted on 4/3/17 at 7:14 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Indictments are coming.
You may be right, but you might not like the names that are on them.
Are you still holding on to hope about Trump/Russia?
Posted on 4/3/17 at 7:19 pm to KCT
quote:
By now, how could even the most ardent anti-Trumper not concede that Trump was right?
Anybody?
The Prog/Dims know Trump was surveilled, just like they knew HRC was being pushed towards the White House by a corrupt MSM colluding with the DNC.
They also know that any of them would be setting behind bars if they were a federal employee and had setup a private email server sending and receiving classified documents.
They also know that HRC colluded with a Russian mining company that eventually lead to the US handing over 20% of it's uranium production.
They also know that Bernie Sanders was never going to win the primary because it was rigged for HRC using "super delegates". (Bernie did get a lake home for his troubles, allegedly!)
They also know that HRC received more money from Wall Street than any politician running for POTUS while telling her base she was one of them.
They also know that the Clinton Crime Foundation was/is a pay for play scam that has fallen on hard times since she is not POTUS. Where did those damn $500k speeches go bitches.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 7:21 pm to Bass Tiger
Of course they were surveilled. They're under FBI investigation.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 7:23 pm to AUsteriskPride
40+ downvotes, three replies: meta, meta, emoji
Par for the course
Par for the course
Posted on 4/3/17 at 7:23 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Of course they were surveilled. They're under FBI investigation.
In May of 2015? Nope.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 7:49 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
Of course they were surveilled. They're under FBI investigation.
And they can't find jack shite because there aint shite. They know the house of cards is in danger of collapse. An IC that has been ideologically compromised will eventually burn to the ground and you know you smell the smoke.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 7:55 pm to Iosh
I fricking love downvotes. I'm currently plotting a 200 downvote post.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:01 pm to KCT
Everyone who understands the definition of "proven".
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:04 pm to bencoleman
quote:
Indictments are coming.
That you really believe that is sad.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:04 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I fricking love downvotes. I'm currently plotting a 200 downvote post.
Be proud, it proves either a lot of people read your posts or they see DBuckeye and slap that down vote on the arse.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:06 pm to KCT
quote:Probably not as much as you are about Obama getting even a slap on the wrist.
Are you still holding on to hope about Trump/Russia?
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:11 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
I fricking love downvotes. I'm currently plotting a 200 downvote pos
Sadly, you don't have the intellect to pull that off. You would have to create so much heat that it would make the most accomplished WWE heel jealous.
I could do it, but I would be gone for a minimum of 3 years.
Posted on 4/3/17 at 8:13 pm to KCT
quote:anyone who isn't trying to make a=b knows that it hasn't been proven
Anybody Here STILL BELIEVE That Trump's Surveillance Accusation Hasn't Been Proven?
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News