Started By
Message

re: UF Series Takeaways

Posted on 3/27/17 at 8:21 pm to
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85311 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 8:21 pm to
Of course there is a situational element to it based on peronnel. Can you explain why PM would have the bunt called with the runner on first then? Because the fact that he had it called to begin with completely destroys your argument.

ETA: would you also defend him less if you knew most people were upset by the no bunt call prior to it not working?
This post was edited on 3/27/17 at 8:29 pm
Posted by geauxtigers33
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2014
13734 posts
Posted on 3/27/17 at 8:37 pm to
Runner at first he was playing for tie when runner got to second with no outs he played for the win. I know most people were calling for bunt before the play I just don't think the decision to not bunt is as bad as people are making it seem. I am way more upset about the next three guys striking out over the one decision CPM made. As far as decision making goes he should have pinch hit for Breaux also.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram