quote:
quote:
Duke
UNC
Kansas
Kentucky

UCLA
Indiana

Michigan State
Arizona
Louisville
UConn

Agree with this. Indiana and UCLA could climb back up but they have fallen behind the big 4 in the past 20-25 years imo

Duke didn't win its first National Championship until 1991.

These lists always devolve into what happened the last 25 years and everything else before is irrelevant. Just how FSU is always near the top in these football lists despite being garbage before 1980.

And what has Kansas done in the past 30 years over UCLA to make up the HUGE disparity of National Titles 11-3 and Final Fours?

Kansas has won 2 Nattys and UCLA has won 1 the last 30 years.

Kansas 8 Final Fours, UCLA 5

That doesn't erase the fact Kansas won 1 title before 1988.

1952, 1988 - the length of time is Michigan football-esque. (1948, 1997)

In between Kansas winning 2 Nattys, UCLA won 10 and went to 14 Final Fours.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Bjorn Cyborg

Member since Sep 2016

27389 posts

Posted on 3/18/17 at 2:14 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa

Who is putting Kansas over UCLA?

I think they are both solid Tier 1.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by nvasil1

Hellinois

Member since Oct 2009

15970 posts

Posted on 3/18/17 at 2:19 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa

quote:
And what has Kansas done in the past 30 years over UCLA to make up the HUGE disparity of National Titles 11-3 and Final Fours?

You make a fair point, but I think KU's blue blood status is tied strongly with their connection to Naismith. Not to mention they've been a consistent winner since the early days of the sport.

0 ...

Report Post

More Sports - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board