re: True or False: climate change

quote:

---

I understand it fine. I don't understand why it's relevant.

---

Then you don't understand it.

quote:

---

Do you think that if I posted a graph where the Y-axis was flat tons and not concentration that it would be linear?

---

Ypu've completely missed the point. You posted a graph of CONCENTRATION which is not 1:1 a measure of FORCING. So your "scary" graphs are not an indicator of forcing (much less temperature). At all. You've completely left out the relationship.

I could post a graph of the number of emails created and it would be all hockey stick looking and "scary". But it would not be indicative of a relationship to termerature.

quote:

---

Do you think I'm not posting it because it's linear?

---

I have no idea why you're posting it. That's why I asked.

quote:

---

I'm making a point about how god damned obnoxious it is when one side provides arguments and data and the other merely cross-examines?

---

Start any time. And don't equate concentration and forcing. That isn't very "scientific".

quote:

---

Is this particularly annoying when the cross-examiner makes irrelevant meta-observations speculating as to your motives?

---