- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: True or False: climate change
Posted on 3/13/17 at 8:37 pm to bmy
Posted on 3/13/17 at 8:37 pm to bmy
quote:
It's implied that they would all have the same exact parameters EXCEPT for the ones noted as possible drivers for climate change.. greenhouse gasses, CO2, water vapor, etc.
nope. Heat transfer calcs can't be done by implication. They are done by setting boundaries,.heat flows, and matching them to observation. You've done none of the above. quote:Again, nope. Those aren't even independent variables, mor are they a complete set of state affixing variables.
Those are the variables that differ in this hypothetical.
Your questions is the equivalent of asking: "I'm in a car somewhere on planet earth, when will I arrive in New York City?
This post was edited on 3/13/17 at 8:41 pm
1
Posted on 3/13/17 at 8:54 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
nope. Heat transfer calcs can't be done by implication. They are done by setting boundaries,.heat flows, and matching them to observation. You've done none of the above
So.. on earth.. quadrupling the water vapor in the atmosphere tomorrow would do nothing because I didn't model my prediction
Retarded argument
We can talk about radiation and the laws of thermodynamics if you really want. I mean after all.. it's what drives weather trends.
This post was edited on 3/13/17 at 8:59 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News