- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Ghost and the Darkness-like or dislike?
Posted on 3/10/17 at 4:08 pm to rebelrouser
Posted on 3/10/17 at 4:08 pm to rebelrouser
quote:
google "roger ebert's worst reviews." the guy was incredibly overrated.
He wasn't an athlete.
He's not rated or unrated...he just had a regional review column for years and a TV show that started off like a Public Access Channel show and became insanely popular.
Did he become some sort of authority? Yes. If you wanted him to be. And him and Siskel were on every movie poster if they liked a movie for promotion. "Siskel and Ebert give it two thumbs up" - is like every movie poster in the 80's that they liked.
Ebert wasn't Pauline Kael - didn't pretend to be. But wrote better than Siskel and Ebert in his later life had a fantastic blog which encouraged readers to write their own things...largest comments section I've ever seen on the internet...ever.
Ebert was anti-Armond White +
Ebert also wrote this review - Most accurate and Hollywood conceit slamming review of all-time
I looked up your google suggestion. What a nit-picky blog.
The Master starts off the list - I love Paul Thomas Anderson - but that movie is mess. Why is this a big deal? 2.5 stars by Ebert? And it says: "should be 4 stars."
Who the frick is giving that movie 4 stars?
Boogie Nights is 4 stars, There will be Blood might be 4 stars and some people think Magnolia is 4 stars.
The Master was a colossal disappointment. It frankly sort of stunk. And Ebert gave Boogie Nights 4 stars and called it a "sprawling masterpiece" - There Will Be Blood 3.5 stars and Magnolia - 4 stars.
And the big deal about Ebert and his reviews always seems to center on Blade Runner - where he saw it in the theaters with the voice-overs. He gave it a bad review and since then everyone has gone apeshite.
He reconciled his review and redid it years later...including it in his Great Movies book.
I think he really missed the boat with Fast Times at Ridgemont High - but he wasn't a teenager in 1980 watching that film...and believe it or not...in 1980 films were geared toward adults and supposed to be more serious. So it's an era and time and place thing to pan that and Caddyshack - which must have seemed just too adolescent at the time. But adolescence caught on years later and now its mainstream movie-making.
This post was edited on 3/10/17 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 3/10/17 at 4:22 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Okay...now defend his review of The Happening.
but seriously, I enjoyed your post
but seriously, I enjoyed your post
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News