Started By
Message
locked post

Cato Institute POV is perfect summation of Trumps lack of knowledge re: fisa .

Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:31 pm
Posted by TJGator1215
FL/TN
Member since Sep 2011
14174 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:31 pm
With regards to this "scandal"

quote:

This is a somewhat stunning, in so far as the president of the United States doesn’t need to get his information about classified activity from Breitbart,” says Cato Institute fellow Julian Sanchez.



And this:

quote:

“If he has evidence that he was wiretapped without a proper FISA order being sought, that would be a huge scandal, and he should produce whatever evidence he’s got,” says Sanchez. “It’s a pretty serious claim, and it’s striking he would make it without anything solid to back it up.”



quote:

While the order would have been requested by some part of the executive branch, Obama can’t order anything. Nor can Trump,” says former NSA lawyer April Doss, who stresses that her comments are based only on public information. “The order has to come from the court, and the court operates independently.”

FISA court judges serve seven-year appointments, so the court’s composition doesn’t ebb and flow with the political tides. What’s more, specific laws adopted in the wake of Watergate prevent the very activity Trump accuses Obama of.

“You can’t tap the phones of a political candidate for political purposes,” says Doss





Why am I not surprised. You even got Sen. Graham defending Obama. Lol.

LINK
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
24073 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

“If he has evidence that he was wiretapped without a proper FISA order being sought, that would be a huge scandal, and he should produce whatever evidence he’s got,” says Sanchez. “It’s a pretty serious claim, and it’s striking he would make it without anything solid to back it up


Fake news.
Posted by TidenUP
Coden, AL
Member since Apr 2011
14654 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

Sanchez.


He has to go back
Posted by FutureRATeammember
Member since Jan 2015
3903 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:33 pm to
Courts don't order wire taps. They only approve them. The above is just spin. If the executive branch tapped trumps phone, that's on obama. If they didn't have evidence that a tap was warranted, this is serious.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:34 pm to
Appeal to Authority Fallacy
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73014 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:34 pm to
Why do leftists act like Lindsayt graham coming out against trump is huge news, and a sign that "republicans" are rally against the president.

Lindsay Graham has consistently been one of the most left-leaning GOP senators in the last 50 years, and among REPUBLICAN voters, he has an approval ratiing in the 30s.
Posted by Rekrul
Member since Feb 2007
9258 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:36 pm to
wired.com? Seems legit
Posted by aggressor
Austin, TX
Member since Sep 2011
9191 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:38 pm to
Legally that may be correct but politically you still have Obama's minions going after a wiretap of Trump in June and then going for it again in October. Then passing EO's that would make sure that any information found would be leaked.

Oh, and that article also assumes that the FISA court is beyond reproach and that the people going for the warrant did not have any political motivations but really believed Trump was basically the Manchurian candidate.
Posted by TJGator1215
FL/TN
Member since Sep 2011
14174 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

Appeal to Trump Fallacy

Posted by Magician2
Member since Oct 2015
14553 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:39 pm to
Im waiting for "journalist" to actually do their job to refute everything from that timeline that Breitbart posted

And so far not a single fricking outlet is putting together a comprehensive rebuttal to refute any of it. Besides a "Oh how dare the President reference a Breitbart article"
Posted by TJGator1215
FL/TN
Member since Sep 2011
14174 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:40 pm to
Because Breitbart is about as credible as the black and white alien tabloids at the the grocery checkout
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
78807 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:41 pm to
Illegal doesn't mean didn't happen. Let's wait and see.
Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Because Breitbart is about as credible as the black and white alien tabloids at the the grocery checkout


Were they caught colluding with a major party candidate?
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

You even got Sen. Graham defending Obama. Lol.


Ok, this statement shows me you don't know what the frick you're talking about
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19143 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

“You can’t tap the phones of a political candidate for political purposes,” says Doss


No, but you can orchestrate a phony "national security" concern with a candidate, take it to the court and get it rubber stamped.

We know already they spied on Flynn illegally. None of the news stories about Flynn mentioned anything about a warrant or FISA approval. They flat-out broke the law.
Posted by TJGator1215
FL/TN
Member since Sep 2011
14174 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:45 pm to
What's really pathetic is the POTUS is getting his "info" from Breitbart and a radio host rather than the actual agencies that have it. Anyone that thinks that's ok or awesome is beyond lost.
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
46618 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:46 pm to
Kochtopus rears its head
Posted by TJGator1215
FL/TN
Member since Sep 2011
14174 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

I'm very worried that our president is suggesting the former president has done something illegal," Graham said at a town hall in Clemson, S.C.

"I'd be very worried if in fact the Obama administration was able to obtain a warrant lawfully about Trump campaign activity with foreign governments. It's my job as United States senator to get to the bottom of this."


Posted by MikeyFL
Member since Sep 2010
10090 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

Because Breitbart is about as credible as the black and white alien tabloids at the the grocery checkout


My grandmother enjoys both - and US Weekly.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

What's really pathetic is the POTUS is getting his "info" from Breitbart and a radio host rather than the actual agencies that have it. Anyone that thinks that's ok or awesome is beyond lost


Do you mean you have a problem with the President of the United States "hearing about this from the same news reports many of you did?"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram