Started By
Message

re: How does this board feel about MLS "ultras"

Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:45 pm to
Posted by oauron
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2011
14515 posts
Posted on 3/3/17 at 11:45 pm to
It's a mixed bag. Lots of clubs with half full stadiums.
Posted by Meursault
Nashville
Member since Sep 2003
25172 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 12:02 am to
It's mostly the MLS 1.0 clubs that are dragging. Chicago, New England, DC United, FC Dallas. Big markets, but bad stadiums, or bad stadium locations. DC is at least getting a new place, which will certainly help matters. And FC Dallas has a SSS, but it feels like a minor league baseball field, and it's about 45 min out from downtown Dallas.

Sporting KC is the gold standard as far as environment, and stadium amenities. It's a beautiful park, great location, great fans. Although Orlando may give them a run this year, I think SKC has been the example that MLS is trying to promote.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84947 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 9:39 am to
quote:

It's a mixed bag. Lots of clubs with half full stadiums.


Lots of clubs with way less than half full stadiums too
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram