- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why does Fox bring Mark Fuhrman on every time there is Police scandal?
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:12 pm to _Hurricane_
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:12 pm to _Hurricane_
It's like bringing in a thief to talk about a robbery, you bring in the most famous dirty cop in America to talk about dirty cops.
0
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:14 pm to More&Les
quote:
It was so much more than the n-word buddy and he specifically pled the 5th as to manufacturing evidence, which there was a strong likelihood some had occurred in this case.
You don't know what you are talking about.
He HAD to take the fifth on ALL questions once he took the fifth on the first question.
You can't pick and choose what questions to plead the fifth on.
If F. Lee Bailey had asked Fuhrman "Did you kill John F. Kennedy?" after Fuhrman pled the fifth, he would have had to say "I wish to assert my fifth amendment privilege.".
Bailey is the GOAT at cross examination and there's a reason why he snuck in the final question about manufacturing evidence - he knew Fuhrman had no choice but to take the fifth.
Blame Ito for not stopping Bailey after Fuhrman took the fifth on the first question, blame Fuhrman for not being a man and owning up to lying about the n-word questions so he could legally answer the evidence questions, blame Clark for not listening to Darden about putting Fuhrman on the stand.
There's a lot of blame to go around but Fuhrman taking the fifth on that question proves nothing.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:16 pm to sms151t
quote:
I'd say the two NYC detectives that were hit men for the mob is a way bigger scandal, but that's just me.
Its not even the biggest LAPD scandal- The Ramparts division thing where the cops basically ran their own gang was way worse.
or you know Rodney King.
This post was edited on 2/26/17 at 12:17 pm
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:19 pm to More&Les
quote:
I'm sure this wasn't Fuhrman, honest upright man that he is but maybe some other LAPD officer that recorded 13 hours of confessions of planting evidence to frame black men because, well they were n!&&@$...?
That's the ironic and deeply stupid thing that enabled parts of OJ's defense - at least some people in Law Enforcement tried to frame a guy who was already guilty and in doing so allowed reasonable doubt to be created.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:21 pm to More&Les
quote:
My bad I must have been thinking
No - your problem is that your thinking sucks.
They could have asked him if he ever had a wet dream or had pissed in the woods and the answer would have been the same = "I wish to assert my 5th Amendment privilege."
It has been explained to you over and over. He asserted the 5th amendment relative to the n-word question. After that, any other question would get the same answer.
But you know all that - you are not that stupid, nor ignorant - you are just a muck-raking liar.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:24 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Furhman is more honest
quote:
Now, yes he gave a false answer under oath
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:25 pm to montanagator
quote:
or you know Rodney King.
Those cops should have been given medals for not killing Rodney King. The 'beating' they gave him was purely defensive and completely justified.
The only option was to just let him go.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:25 pm to BamaChick
quote:
Blame Ito for not stopping Bailey after Fuhrman took the fifth on the first question, blame Fuhrman for not being a man and owning up to lying about the n-word questions so he could legally answer the evidence questions, blame Clark for not listening to Darden about putting Fuhrman on the stand.
There's a lot of blame to go around but Fuhrman taking the fifth on that question proves nothing.
To some extent or another all of this is true.
It is also true that Fuhrman admitted to manufacturing evidence as an LAPD detective on those tapes.
It is also true that Fuhrman admitted to framing black men because they were, as he put it, n!&&@$.
It is also true that some evidence, the bloody sock for example, was questionable, at the very least.
Had MF not been a lying pos he wouldn't have "had" to plead the fifth and should/could have answered those three questions.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:27 pm to Tigerdev
you folks need something to soothe your triggered feelings - go ahead and relive one of your early successful travesties.
I'm outta this one
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:30 pm to ChineseBandit58
You are white knighting for someone who claimed a Law Enforcement Officer who perjured himself on the stand is "honest". No meme in the world is going to make you look like you have an ounce of credibility here.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:35 pm to More&Les
They don't see a problem with a cop that drops N-bombs, lies on the stand, and frames black people.
Probably because they secretly like that sort of thing.
Probably because they secretly like that sort of thing.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:38 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:Umm...Furman got buried by perjuring himself on the stand of a high profile murder case.
Furman got buried when an old audio tape, unrelated to the case, was played where he said some racist stuff.
In what world would you accept the testimony of someone who lied under oath? Are you people insane?
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:48 pm to SlapahoeTribe
quote:
Olivia Benson
Pics?
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:48 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
ChineseBandit58
You are an interesting piece of work. You always see yourself on the high ground while launching personal attacks and literally defending a pos who lied under oath, pled out to perjury and literally admitted to framing innocent civilians because of their race.
I'm a long time conservative and Fox news consumer and proud member of a very BLUE family. Fuhrman gives good cops a bad name and he can gfh.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:50 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
As a detective, in that specific case, his work was without reproach.
This.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 12:56 pm to montanagator
quote:
That's the ironic and deeply stupid thing that enabled parts of OJ's defense - at least some people in Law Enforcement tried to frame a guy who was already guilty and in doing so allowed reasonable doubt to be created.
Hmmmmmmmmm
Posted on 2/26/17 at 1:00 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Again, his detective work was good, that's all I ever said. He never planted the evidence because oj did it, and admitted to his former agent that he did it years later.
Wow. Just Wow.
Posted on 2/26/17 at 1:00 pm to member12
quote:
As a detective, in that specific case, his work was without reproach.
This.
And yet he "had to" plead the fifth about whether he manufacturered evidence and there was ample evidence tof suggest at least some evidence had been tampered with and/or manufactured....
Posted on 2/26/17 at 2:15 pm to More&Les
And yet you're an idiot still it's been explained multiple times in this thread why
Stop being stupid
Your line of thinking we need to be pissed at OJ that he took the 5th
Stop being stupid
Your line of thinking we need to be pissed at OJ that he took the 5th
This post was edited on 2/26/17 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 2/26/17 at 3:01 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
Umm...Furman got buried by perjuring himself on the stand of a high profile murder case.
In what world would you accept the testimony of someone who lied under oath? Are you people insane?
This. Now you can argue he was tripped up intentionally by the "Dream Team" but that's just good lawyering.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News