- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NOAA Whistleblower: How world leaders were duped over manipulated AGW data
Posted on 2/6/17 at 7:47 am to olddawg26
Posted on 2/6/17 at 7:47 am to olddawg26
quote:
I'm about to head to the natural history museum in London, anything you morons want me to ask them since you won't actually persue any real research on this issue on your own?
I'm your huckleberry.
I want you to ask him/her why the predictive computer models always (seriously, it is always) skew the temperature predictions higher than the values measured via satellites.
I'd also like you to ask his/her opinions on why temperature measurements seem to correlate more with solar energy output than CO2 concentrations. While you're at it, ask him about the relative greenhouse effect values of CO2, CH4, and H2O.
Finally, as this is in my opinion the most pressing issue related to climate change, ask him/her how much more CO2 the oceans can handle before the average pH drops even one one hundredth from the established average.
Now I know you think I'm just some toothless, cousin-screwing, mouth breather from Alabama, but I actually have a PhD in chemical engineering with my dissertation being titled "Advanced Solvents for CO2 Separations." In addition, I am fairly well traveled having taught at DTU in Lyngby, Denmark the past two summers, and presented at numerous conferences in the states and abroad.
ETA the gif
This post was edited on 2/6/17 at 7:53 am
6
Posted on 2/6/17 at 7:48 am to BamaChemE
Posted on 2/6/17 at 8:58 am to BamaChemE
I'd be interested in hearing why, in the NOAA study at least, "scientific" error corrections come without any error bars/envelope/analysis. Is it because if you ignore discussion of expected error margins you can tweak it to say whatever the hell you want it to say? Meanwhile, no one with an ounce of academic integrity can trust the data because there's no way of knowing if your "corrected" values are significant or not.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 8:59 am to BamaChemE
Stand down sir! OldDawg is a diesel mechanic from Waycross, Ga and he has traveled to Florida AND Alabama. He also has access to a climate scientist at a museum. How dare you come up on here with that PH.D. shite about CO2 separations and overseas teaching and presenting at conferences. OldDawg is the REAL authority around here.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 10:54 am to BamaChemE
quote:Three excellent questions. I would love to hear a real climate scientist answer them.
I want you to ask him/her why the predictive computer models always (seriously, it is always) skew the temperature predictions higher than the values measured via satellites.
I'd also like you to ask his/her opinions on why temperature measurements seem to correlate more with solar energy output than CO2 concentrations. While you're at it, ask him about the relative greenhouse effect values of CO2, CH4, and H2O.
Finally, as this is in my opinion the most pressing issue related to climate change, ask him/her how much more CO2 the oceans can handle before the average pH drops even one one hundredth from the established average.
I'm assuming olddawg's sudden disappearance from this thread is because he's at the museum getting the answers as he promised.
Posted on 2/6/17 at 3:24 pm to BamaChemE
quote:
Now I know you think I'm just some toothless, cousin-screwing, mouth breather from Alabama, but I actually have a PhD in chemical engineering
C'mon and be honest, are those two necessarily mutually exclusive?
Posted on 2/6/17 at 8:11 pm to BamaChemE
quote:
quote: I'm about to head to the natural history museum in London, anything you morons want me to ask them since you won't actually persue any real research on this issue on your own? I'm your huckleberry. I want you to ask him/her why the predictive computer models always (seriously, it is always) skew the temperature predictions higher than the values measured via satellites. I'd also like you to ask his/her opinions on why temperature measurements seem to correlate more with solar energy output than CO2 concentrations. While you're at it, ask him about the relative greenhouse effect values of CO2, CH4, and H2O. Finally, as this is in my opinion the most pressing issue related to climate change, ask him/her how much more CO2 the oceans can handle before the average pH drops even one one hundredth from the established average.
Im in the fence with AGW
Can you talk more about these topics. Or point me to sources that do.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News