Started By
Message

re: Those who support the injunction against Trump

Posted on 2/4/17 at 8:47 am to
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54259 posts
Posted on 2/4/17 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Are you really going to debate that?



Like I said, I'm not here to debate semantics. However, the four people in this thread "arguing" against me are doing exactly what I said, defending your side in the name of politics. Not one of you have shown any concern about safety. If you honestly think no one from any of those nations could do us harm, then you have won your argument. Congrats.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 2/4/17 at 8:49 am to
You are creating a false dichotomy. It's possible to be against the ban for non-political reasons. It's also possible to be focused on security while believing that the ban doesn't achieve it and/or is not constitutional.

You're letting your emotions drag you into irrational debate.
This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 8:51 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram