- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Those who support the injunction against Trump
Posted on 2/4/17 at 8:47 am to cahoots
Posted on 2/4/17 at 8:47 am to cahoots
quote:
Are you really going to debate that?
Like I said, I'm not here to debate semantics. However, the four people in this thread "arguing" against me are doing exactly what I said, defending your side in the name of politics. Not one of you have shown any concern about safety. If you honestly think no one from any of those nations could do us harm, then you have won your argument. Congrats.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 8:49 am to Homesick Tiger
You are creating a false dichotomy. It's possible to be against the ban for non-political reasons. It's also possible to be focused on security while believing that the ban doesn't achieve it and/or is not constitutional.
You're letting your emotions drag you into irrational debate.
You're letting your emotions drag you into irrational debate.
This post was edited on 2/4/17 at 8:51 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)