- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Immigration Policies in other countries...
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:54 pm to AnarchySupporter
Posted on 2/3/17 at 10:54 pm to AnarchySupporter
quote:
when are we going to start seeing Mexico, Costa Rica, Jamaica, Brazil, Argentina, South Africa, Morocco, Algeria, India, Pakistan, Turkey, Kazakhstan accepting white people in mass and allowing white people to change their culture?
Wait a second. Some of these countries you listed are majority white countries already. In fact, Argentina is whiter now than America was even when it was great. Hell its more European than many European countries are now.
Posted on 2/4/17 at 1:53 am to Asgard Device
quote:
Wait a second. Some of these countries you listed are majority white countries already. In fact, Argentina is whiter now than America was even when it was great. Hell its more European than many European countries are now.
Not really true. Argentinians are a mixed lot, far more mixed than white Americans are (on average). For instance, [link=(one genetic study)]https://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2008/03/genetics-the-myth-buster-the-case-of-argentina/#.WJWBrfkrKUk[/link] of Argentina was done a few years ago where they found that most Argentinians who identified as "white" had, on average, 20% American Indian heritage and about 2% African slave heritage. Moreover, they found that the Amerind heritage was mostly on the female side, which complies with the notion that colonial men married native wives. However, their sample was rather small (94 participants I think). I would like to see a larger sample, but I think the results are still relevant nonetheless.
In America, 23andme did a study on racial admixture using a pool of like 150,000 people in their database. They took every sample from people that self-identified as "white" and ran admixture tests. They concluded that American Indian heritage in Whites was extremely low (something like 2% of whites have Indian heritage) and black ancestry was almost unheard of outside the South. However, in the South, about 12% of white people in Louisiana have black ancestry. 12% in South Carolina. And about 10% in the rest of the former slave states (SEC country, basically). Now out of this 10%, the black heritage was only about 2-3% on average (in other words 10% of whites in the south have 2-3% black heritage). Small, but still there.
But more interesting to me was they found very little American Indian ancestry in whites. This flies in the face of the "Indian princess" stories that almost all of us white people have in our family folklore. Turns out, most of those stories are complete BS (as many people find out when they research their family tree).
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News