Started By
Message
locked post

HR 621 - Selling Off Our Public Lands - to be withdrawn

Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:14 am
Posted by PNW
Northern Rockies
Member since Mar 2014
6193 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:14 am
Jason Chaffetz is WITHDRAWING his proposal to sell off 3.3M acres of public lands. This is a huge win for us outdoor enthusiasts, conservationists, and explorers.

quote:

jasoninthehouse I am withdrawing HR 621. I'm a proud gun owner, hunter and love our public lands. The bill would have disposed of small parcels of lands Pres. Clinton identified as serving no public purpose but groups I support and care about fear it sends the wrong message. The bill was originally introduced several years ago. I look forward to working with you. I hear you and HR 621 dies tomorrow. #keepitpublic #tbt



The Wilderness Society
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 7:15 am
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17439 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:22 am to
Meh.

It would have been sold and the new owner would have leased it out. You would have had an opportunity to enjoy the land

BLM tries to do too much. I'm indifferent on them selling or not selling, but I don't understand anyone who is spinning it for selfish personal reasons.
Posted by GIbson05
Member since Feb 2009
4292 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:30 am to
Sucks that the west side of the US has ~50% federal land but the east side only has ~3%.

Wish we had more public hunting land here but oh well.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13513 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:38 am to
I'm so happy I get to keep my free shite!

Feds own 640 million acres and we can't sell 3.3 million.
Selling 0.5% of federal land would be a disastrous development for selfish snowflake "sportsmen".
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16972 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:43 am to
I guess this would have fared better if they would have simply given the lands away to the UN.

Like Ted Turner plans to do with his western land holdings.
Posted by gamatt53
Member since Nov 2010
4934 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:00 am to
Awesome! Big win for us sportsmen
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99703 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:01 am to
Guess even conservative hunters want their free shite and whine when someone might take it away...
Posted by seawolf06
NH
Member since Oct 2007
8159 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:41 am to
Maybe someone else with some balls will take it back up and get it done.
Posted by gamatt53
Member since Nov 2010
4934 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:53 am to
This needs to go next

H.R.622 - Local Enforcement for Local Lands Act

Congress.gov

It calls for federal "block grants" to go to the state/local authorities to enforce the law on public federal land. Why would we need to give them welfare if they are capable of doing a better job?

This is just another attack on federal public land. Down the road it will be "oh look the state/local guys can't protect it...well shucks guess we have to sell it."
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 8:58 am
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 10:37 am to
quote:

This is a huge win for us outdoor enthusiasts, conservationists, and explorers.
I can understand not wanting to sell off national parks, forests, etc., but I don't understand what purpose is served by BLM owning so much land.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:58 pm to
meanwhile the CRA used to get rid of the mining stream protection rule

although if i had to choose between the two... good bye 621
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram