- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
HR 621 - Selling Off Our Public Lands - to be withdrawn
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:14 am
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:14 am
Jason Chaffetz is WITHDRAWING his proposal to sell off 3.3M acres of public lands. This is a huge win for us outdoor enthusiasts, conservationists, and explorers.
The Wilderness Society
quote:
jasoninthehouse I am withdrawing HR 621. I'm a proud gun owner, hunter and love our public lands. The bill would have disposed of small parcels of lands Pres. Clinton identified as serving no public purpose but groups I support and care about fear it sends the wrong message. The bill was originally introduced several years ago. I look forward to working with you. I hear you and HR 621 dies tomorrow. #keepitpublic #tbt
The Wilderness Society
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 7:15 am
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:22 am to PNW
Meh.
It would have been sold and the new owner would have leased it out. You would have had an opportunity to enjoy the land
BLM tries to do too much. I'm indifferent on them selling or not selling, but I don't understand anyone who is spinning it for selfish personal reasons.
It would have been sold and the new owner would have leased it out. You would have had an opportunity to enjoy the land
BLM tries to do too much. I'm indifferent on them selling or not selling, but I don't understand anyone who is spinning it for selfish personal reasons.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:30 am to PNW
Sucks that the west side of the US has ~50% federal land but the east side only has ~3%.
Wish we had more public hunting land here but oh well.
Wish we had more public hunting land here but oh well.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:38 am to PNW
I'm so happy I get to keep my free shite!
Feds own 640 million acres and we can't sell 3.3 million.
Selling 0.5% of federal land would be a disastrous development for selfish snowflake "sportsmen".
Feds own 640 million acres and we can't sell 3.3 million.
Selling 0.5% of federal land would be a disastrous development for selfish snowflake "sportsmen".
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:43 am to PNW
I guess this would have fared better if they would have simply given the lands away to the UN.
Like Ted Turner plans to do with his western land holdings.
Like Ted Turner plans to do with his western land holdings.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:00 am to PNW
Awesome! Big win for us sportsmen
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:01 am to PNW
Guess even conservative hunters want their free shite and whine when someone might take it away...
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:41 am to PNW
Maybe someone else with some balls will take it back up and get it done.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 8:53 am to PNW
This needs to go next
H.R.622 - Local Enforcement for Local Lands Act
Congress.gov
It calls for federal "block grants" to go to the state/local authorities to enforce the law on public federal land. Why would we need to give them welfare if they are capable of doing a better job?
This is just another attack on federal public land. Down the road it will be "oh look the state/local guys can't protect it...well shucks guess we have to sell it."
H.R.622 - Local Enforcement for Local Lands Act
Congress.gov
It calls for federal "block grants" to go to the state/local authorities to enforce the law on public federal land. Why would we need to give them welfare if they are capable of doing a better job?
This is just another attack on federal public land. Down the road it will be "oh look the state/local guys can't protect it...well shucks guess we have to sell it."
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 8:58 am
Posted on 2/2/17 at 10:37 am to PNW
quote:I can understand not wanting to sell off national parks, forests, etc., but I don't understand what purpose is served by BLM owning so much land.
This is a huge win for us outdoor enthusiasts, conservationists, and explorers.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 7:58 pm to PNW
meanwhile the CRA used to get rid of the mining stream protection rule
although if i had to choose between the two... good bye 621
although if i had to choose between the two... good bye 621
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News