- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scientists Run Calculations To Prove The Existence of God
Posted on 1/21/17 at 9:51 pm to Hoodatt
Posted on 1/21/17 at 9:51 pm to Hoodatt
quote:
Dr Gödel’s model uses mathematical equations that are extremely complicated, but the essence is that no greater power than God can be conceived
Welp, that proves it.
quote:
and if he or she is believed as a concept then he or she can exist in reality.
Oh wait, apparently it does!
1
Posted on 1/22/17 at 8:39 am to tom
Disclaimer: I believe in God.
It's an equation "proving" the mathematics of the ontological argument so of course it is going to be self-referencing.
You don't need math to prove the ontological argument to the degree this equation did. The structure of the argument is built on a valid form of deductive logic which assumes it's own truth within its form. Therefore, it's deductive and 100% formally valid. It's informal validity is what you are calling into question.
It's an equation "proving" the mathematics of the ontological argument so of course it is going to be self-referencing.
You don't need math to prove the ontological argument to the degree this equation did. The structure of the argument is built on a valid form of deductive logic which assumes it's own truth within its form. Therefore, it's deductive and 100% formally valid. It's informal validity is what you are calling into question.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News