- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In their prime.. I need some answers
Posted on 1/20/17 at 11:37 pm to biglego
Posted on 1/20/17 at 11:37 pm to biglego
Griffey was a superior player to pre juiced Bonds. Although its close and Griffey personality got him points....as one poster already said Bonds Pittsburgh and pre 99-00 SF career was HOF caliber...but if my 10 yr old self remembers correctly, Griffey was easily the better player of the two.
Posted on 1/20/17 at 11:39 pm to Jack Ruby
quote:fwiw the numbers say otherwise. Never had a chance to watch pre roid bonds or griffey in Seattle but just looking at the numbers, bonds was the better player
Griffey was easily the better player of the two.
This post was edited on 1/20/17 at 11:40 pm
Posted on 1/21/17 at 12:21 am to Jack Ruby
quote:
Griffey was a superior player to pre juiced Bonds. Although its close and Griffey personality got him points....as one poster already said Bonds Pittsburgh and pre 99-00 SF career was HOF caliber...but if my 10 yr old self remembers correctly, Griffey was easily the better player of the two.
Griffey was more liked but I don't know that he was better. Certainly not by a wide margin if at all.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)