Started By
Message

re: In their prime.. I need some answers

Posted on 1/20/17 at 11:37 pm to
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
23027 posts
Posted on 1/20/17 at 11:37 pm to
Griffey was a superior player to pre juiced Bonds. Although its close and Griffey personality got him points....as one poster already said Bonds Pittsburgh and pre 99-00 SF career was HOF caliber...but if my 10 yr old self remembers correctly, Griffey was easily the better player of the two.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145489 posts
Posted on 1/20/17 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

Griffey was easily the better player of the two.
fwiw the numbers say otherwise. Never had a chance to watch pre roid bonds or griffey in Seattle but just looking at the numbers, bonds was the better player
This post was edited on 1/20/17 at 11:40 pm
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76831 posts
Posted on 1/21/17 at 12:21 am to
quote:

Griffey was a superior player to pre juiced Bonds. Although its close and Griffey personality got him points....as one poster already said Bonds Pittsburgh and pre 99-00 SF career was HOF caliber...but if my 10 yr old self remembers correctly, Griffey was easily the better player of the two.

Griffey was more liked but I don't know that he was better. Certainly not by a wide margin if at all.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram