Started By
Message

re: Why do so many MLB teams bid against themselves?

Posted on 1/19/17 at 12:45 pm to
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145489 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Scherzersooks good because he's been dominant but he's got a lot of deferred money and that's a bit scary for my taste. He's been incredible thus far though.

meh, doesnt change anything about his actual production which he has absolutely no signs of slowing down any time soon. the value he will be providing them right now will be more than worth it once the deferments kick in
quote:

Ellsbury, and Crawford
these guys didnt get 200 million but fine. you can add them if you want
quote:

Price and Greinke were both average at best last year, but you're not paying those guys to be average.
price was worth 4.5 wins which is worth 36 million dollars so he still provided $6 million in surplus value to the red sox. zack greinke had a rough year last year but he is the single biggest favorite for having a bounce back year so thats still up in the air to me

so once again, when you actually take the time to look at it, it turns out that these contract work about as often as they dont which is the nature of the sport
This post was edited on 1/19/17 at 12:49 pm
Posted by BenDover
Member since Jul 2010
5434 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 4:09 pm to
You can use those analytical numbers all you want but I don't think you'll find too many people who will agree with you that Price actually provided a surplus performance relative to his contract.

He made $30MM to throw a 4 ERA with a 1.2 WHIP, not to mention his implosion against Cleveland in the postseason. That's horrendous anyway you slice it. He's not being paid to put up back-end of the rotation numbers.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram