Started By
Message

re: How many teams in history could lose their best player & still be the best team?

Posted on 1/18/17 at 10:14 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96376 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 10:14 pm to
93 bulls without MJ would have likely been favorites. They damn near won it all in 95 without MJ. The key is in 94 and 95 they were without MJ AND Horace

So 93 without MJ, but still having Horace, they are the favorites IMHO

ETA: looks like 94 did have Horace.

93 bulls without MJ would have still been near the top, and possibly favorites
This post was edited on 1/18/17 at 10:20 pm
Posted by Winston Cup
Dallas Cowboys Fan
Member since May 2016
65524 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 10:16 pm to
Don't you know? CC dominated that year and would have won easily even if mj played.

Edit to add those years
This post was edited on 1/18/17 at 10:20 pm
Posted by LittleRockHog501
Member since Nov 2011
2485 posts
Posted on 1/18/17 at 10:37 pm to
I disagree. 93 was the year the Suns won 60 and despite losing in 6 gave Chicago everything they could handle. They would not be favorites without MJ over that very same team
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279373 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 8:53 am to
quote:

93 bulls without MJ would have likely been favorites. They damn near won it all in 95 without MJ. The key is in 94 and 95 they were without MJ AND Horace

So 93 without MJ, but still having Horace, they are the favorites IMHO

ETA: looks like 94 did have Horace.

93 bulls without MJ would have still been near the top, and possibly favorites



i tried to read this 10x and still dont understand it. Either way, no Bulls team without MJ was ever a threat to win it all
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram