Started By
Message

re: Why receiver Nate Craig-Myers did not play more in 2016 (247)

Posted on 1/6/17 at 2:37 pm to
Posted by LuckyInKentucky
Member since Sep 2014
613 posts
Posted on 1/6/17 at 2:37 pm to
He plays ok on occasion, I will give him that. But it just seemed like he always had more negative plays (crucial drops, missed assignments) than positive. I'm not bashing him by any means, but at 6'4" he should've been much more consistent.

Nevertheless, hopefully some of the new guys can plug right into his spot and make a difference, especially with Stidham slinging the rock.
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 1/6/17 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

But it just seemed like he always had more negative plays (crucial drops, missed assignments) than positive


This year, he actually was a solid contributor and his reputation blinded people from that. I'm sure if you added up the drop totals, he is significantly lower than most on the board would believe. He also never seemed like a liability blocking


For Kyle Davis, he supposedly didn't know the playbook and often ran incorrect routes and/or blocking assignments.

Obviously the NCM lack of playing time over the season is explained.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter