- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/8/16 at 9:13 am to AlxTgr
quote:
Stop. Money has nothing to do with this.
Money does have to do with it. Public dollars should't be spent fixing private marsh. That doesn't mean in public dollars are being spent that people have the right to trespass. Just means the money shouldn't be spent.
Posted on 12/8/16 at 9:18 am to AlxTgr
quote:
Stop. Money has nothing to do with this.
Do you think we should have a coastal restoration plan?
If yes, who should pay for it?
If you think it should be paid for with tax dollars, do you think you can convince a tax base that it's in their best interest to restore the coast line even if they are excluded from it's use? More or less paying to make sure those people with vanishing property can continue to enjoy it at the tax payers expense?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)