- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas makes attempt to eliminate Sanctuary Cities in-state.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 12:58 pm to lionward2014
Posted on 12/4/16 at 12:58 pm to lionward2014
My question is, if the federal law must be enforced by state and local authorities, do you agree that marijuana laws should also be required to be enforced?
Posted on 12/4/16 at 12:59 pm to Jibbajabba
Read the post directly above yours for your answer.
Posted on 12/4/16 at 2:50 pm to Jibbajabba
No, because I think federal drug laws are an over reach, at least in terms of dictating where weed should be legal. The Feds should have control over importation of drugs, like all trade, and there is some issues with the Feds having interstate commerce power (the ruling for the California home growing pot law focused on the interstate commerce clause), but overall state drug laws should fall under state police power and 10th Amendment protection. Immigration and naturalization laws are expressly granted to Congress in the Constitution, so state's have no choice but to comply with them (see Arizona trying to make stricter immigration enforcement laws and SCOTUS finding preemption).
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News