Started By
Message

re: Texas approves regulation requiring burial or cremation of aborted fetuses no

Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:49 pm to
Posted by shell01
Marianna, FL
Member since Jul 2014
793 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 7:49 pm to
What next, require burial of parts of humans? What about an amputated limb? Or a brain tumor? Should we require burial of those as well?
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
13139 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

What next, require burial of parts of humans? What about an amputated limb? Or a brain tumor? Should we require burial of those as well?



Is that even on the table? Or is "What next?" followed by something totally ridiculous, your strategy of choice for every legislative proposal?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

What next, require burial of parts of humans?


That makes no sense. Can you connect the "logic dots" as to how you arrived at that conclusion? Is it the slippery slope fallacy?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram