- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Active shooter at Ohio State - at least 8 injured so far
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:58 pm to TigernMS12
Posted on 11/28/16 at 12:58 pm to TigernMS12
quote:
WASHINGTON, June 27 - The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.
LINK
In what jurisdictions is the Supreme Court's rulings relevant?
Posted on 11/28/16 at 1:02 pm to the808bass
Even better find.
Thanks.
People need to get it through their thick skulls that cops have zero obligation to protect you.
None.
You are obligated to protect yourself.
Thanks.
People need to get it through their thick skulls that cops have zero obligation to protect you.
None.
You are obligated to protect yourself.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)