Started By
Message

re: Todd Grantham

Posted on 1/11/17 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by ChargerDog91
Member since May 2012
4394 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 2:21 pm to
So Grantham's last season at UGA in which ya'll lost 12 players who had started off the 2012 defense (number 5 in the nation mind you) he gave up a ton more yards? Holee shite, I would've never known that was possible.

Not only that, most of the teams that ya'll gave up yards to were very good teams. The only one that wasn't? Vandy. In which you lost 31-27. Want to know why? Your offense was miserable. 221 total yards and 3 turnovers. I'll even throw in the Missouri loss for shits and giggles. You lost 41-26. Your offense had a ton of yards and moved the ball but had 4 turnovers in the loss. In any other games ya'll lost or had gave up a ton of points, it was against teams that no one could slow down all year.

So basically, your biggest criticism against him is that a team with very young, inexperienced players didn't play well against extremely talented, experienced offenses. And it seems your offense tended to have a ton of turnovers resulting in the loss of some of those games. But he's terrible.
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
29565 posts
Posted on 1/11/17 at 2:55 pm to
I mean people do change and adapt. Maybe Grantham failing at UGA forced him to modify his defense? he may very well be a good hire.


both sides of the argument look ridiculous. he failed at UGA, and he did pretty well at UL. He'll probably be average at State
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram