Started By
Message

re: LSU Is Not and Never Has Been a Top 5 Program Historically

Posted on 11/20/16 at 9:24 am to
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42582 posts
Posted on 11/20/16 at 9:24 am to
LSU is a great job. It does lack the resources of other schools, but shouldn't aim for lower candidates. Historical rankings are overrated.
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8967 posts
Posted on 11/20/16 at 9:27 am to
quote:

It does lack the resources of other schools,


Not in the Athletics department which is all that matters for this job. LSU is one of the largest and most profitable Athletic departments in the country - google it if you don't believe me!

Posted by I am GLORIOUS
On Tanden's Pond
Member since Oct 2016
3128 posts
Posted on 11/20/16 at 11:08 am to
As stated prior, LSU's relevance on a national scale didn't juggernaut until Sabsn win the NC. Even when they were considered "good" back in the 80s, they weren't elite. Seemed like every time they did well they'd play Nebraska in the bowl and get shellacked. The fact that we hadn't won it all since 1959 just shows how far behind we are in the "historically speaking" category.
This post was edited on 11/20/16 at 11:09 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram