Started By
Message

re: 5th Grade Social Studies: Abraham Lincoln

Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:26 pm to
Posted by AU86
Member since Aug 2009
22479 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

Perhaps his belief in God or simply decency would have kept him away from the godless, heaten filled Democratic Party..



Lincoln was a tyrant who butchered the constitution more than any other president. And that includes Obama. I believe that Lincoln was probably opposed personally to slavery. But that is not why he opposed the expansion of slavery. Lincoln stated himself that the constitution would not allow him to abolish slavery where it already existed. Lincoln was interested in the expansion of the empire to the west. It is known that he wanted to populate the western territories with the white European immigrants and he wanted the land, jobs and opportunities reserved for them. He even said so. His support of high tariffs to finance the internal improvement projects that would enhance the industrialization of those areas made his railroad Barron friends wealthy. The expansion of slavery threatened that scenario. 80% of all federal revenue came from tariffs generated in the Southern ports. He needed that money to finance his internal improvement projects to enhance western expansion and northern industrialization. When the South seceded they initiated free trade with little to no tarrifs in the ports. Guess where tarrifs were collected? And guess where the vast majority of ports were located. Lincoln would be left with about two ports that could collect tarrifs if he let the South go. That is the main reason that he chose to re-supply Fort Sumter. If he held the fort he could still try and collect tarrifs for the federal government. Lincoln initiated the Emancipation for three reasons: 1. To weaken the southern economy and their ability to wage war. 2. To stop England and France from recognizing the Confederacy 3. The Emancipation allowed the enlistment of 200,000 former slaves into Union ranks. Lincoln needed soldiers.
This post was edited on 11/14/16 at 6:45 pm
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Lincoln was a tyrant who butchered the constitution more than any other president.


Oh dear. Sorry that is totally wrong. Lincoln made plain in 1861 what the Supreme Court said in Texas v. White after the war. The Articles of Confederation plighted the states to a perpetual Union. They are actually called "The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union."

The Constitution which superseded the Articles sought a "more perfect Union." What could be more indissoluble than a perpetual Union made more perfect?

Lincoln's oath required him, as he said in his first inaugural address, to transmit the government intact to his successor.

And that is what happened.
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

But that is not why he opposed the expansion of slavery.


Lincoln wrote a famous letter on this subject.

Executive Mansion,
Washington, April 4, 1864.

A.G. Hodges, Esq
Frankfort, Ky.

My dear Sir: You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally said the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows:

"I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel. And yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially upon this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it my view that I might take an oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power. I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery...."

To demonstrate the point of the difficulty in eradicating slavery, Lincoln told a parable.

Suppose your children were all in a bed and you discovered poisonous serpents in the bed. How to remove them?

The answer is: very carefully.

The children were the states and the serpent was slavery.

Lincoln's plan to remove the serpent was to keep it out of the national territories. If slavery could not expand, it would begin to die. The Slave Power knew that too. After he was elected he told his handlers to hold onto this position as with a chain of steel.

Representatives of the slave states inquired? Is Lincoln serious?

The answer was yes, and within a few weeks, the southern states were writing their secession documents.

This post was edited on 11/14/16 at 7:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram