Started By
Message

re: Updated: Full auto lower laws.. Answer from ATF on page 2

Posted on 10/31/16 at 9:33 pm to
Posted by Timmayy
Houston
Member since Mar 2016
1592 posts
Posted on 10/31/16 at 9:33 pm to
Ok so because he has a tax stamped mg he would be covered from constructive possession. But someone who has not yet received a tax stamp for an sbr/mg or does not have a pistol lower could be charged because he would have constructive possession of sbr
Posted by Propagandalf
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2010
2528 posts
Posted on 10/31/16 at 9:39 pm to
I hope you don't have any spare AR parts laying around. Like not even a detent or roll pin. Constructive possession. And you can't own any handguns that arent Form 1'd since they could be converted to an SBR by adding a stock.

You're over thinking it and misinterpreting the law that you quoted.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram