re: People Melting over Orgeron. Why not wait and see?

quote:

---

People keep spouting this same tired bullshite with nothing to back it up. What are the specific skills required that differentiate a full time HC from an interim that Orgeron will not have either shown he possesses or not by the end of this season?

---

Are you quite serious? It would take untold paragraphs to fully differentiate between the two. For present purposes, I'll name three pivotal distinctions. First, recruiting. And remember, as head coach, you aren't simply responsible for wooing specific players, you have to craft effective multi-year plans regarding how to deploy limited scholarships. You don't want to end up with a glut of five stars at one position and no depth at another. Similarly, a permanent head coach has to manage transfers and attrition over multiple seasons. Second, assistant hiring. Right now, O has a staff in place. What happens if, to take one example, Aranda leaves after next year? The head coach would have to be able to successfully evaluate and attract a promising replacement. That's a function you don't have to perform as an intra-season interim coach. Third, changing your systems over time. When our SEC foes have extensive tape on our new permanent coach from years' worth of games, will he be able to effectively adapt, anticipate, and innovate? That's precisely where Miles ultimately failed.

Those are just three. I didn't even mention things like modulating your leadership style (so you don't grate on players and lose their attention over time), maximizing the productivity of spring practice, being ultimately accountable for every aspect of NCAA compliance, instilling a lasting culture of discipline and winning, and so and and so forth.