Started By
Message

re: The SEC is ultimately to blame

Posted on 10/6/16 at 10:33 pm to
Posted by LSUGlory16
Mville
Member since Jun 2014
1138 posts
Posted on 10/6/16 at 10:33 pm to
How did they not have a Plan B when it was clearly obvious that UF wanted nothing to do with playing this game? SEC should of laid out a plan B for UF on Wednesday, accept LSU's offer of TS or here's what we are going to do. Instead we allowed a desperate team to filibuster us to get what they wanted.
Posted by EffingTiger
Member since Nov 2015
333 posts
Posted on 10/6/16 at 10:40 pm to
The SEC originally did tell UF to reschedule the game, right? Then the SEC backed down and allowed UF to dictate. I get that.

But they are both to blame: UF for making things difficult for all parties concerned (not the least of which, LSU) and the SEC for letting the tail wag the dog.

It's infinitely clear that UF didn't want to play this game to their benefit. Had they wanted to play, they would have accommodated an alternative.

UF's original press release stating that the game would not be moved and would be played in Gainsville set the tone for this whole fiasco.
This post was edited on 10/6/16 at 10:43 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram