Started By
Message

re: TCU to vote no on Big 12 Expansion

Posted on 9/30/16 at 11:58 pm to
Posted by Tiger Phanatick
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2008
4103 posts
Posted on 9/30/16 at 11:58 pm to
Why are these schools voting no?

A TV contract is on the line. I'm confused right now Texas is eating and the rest of these schools are scrapping up the residue.

What is the thought process?
Posted by 7nette
Member since Nov 2015
4909 posts
Posted on 10/1/16 at 12:01 am to
probably not satisfied with the options they have
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35634 posts
Posted on 10/1/16 at 12:02 am to
I'm not sure either. Maybe they're worried that Houston will come in and destroy them all and take their recruits?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85490 posts
Posted on 10/1/16 at 12:03 am to
quote:

Why are these schools voting no?

A TV contract is on the line.


That seems to be the reason for the no vote. What does UH bring to the table? They'll dominate the Houston TV market with or without UH.
Posted by TheCheshireHog
Cashew Chicken Country
Member since Oct 2010
40919 posts
Posted on 10/1/16 at 2:19 am to
quote:

Why are these schools voting no?


Because they want to kill their own conference. Honestly, it's going to be pretty humorous when Texas and OU bail and these other schools like Iowa State and Kansas State that are against expansion get left out in the cold.

They could have thought long term and added BYU and Houston to actually strengthen the conference but they're worried about short term and are worried they won't recruit as well in Texas if they expand so they'll follow along with everyone else. That'll eventually kill the conference and then those schools will act shocked like they didn't realize it could actually happen.
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 10/1/16 at 3:08 am to
quote:

Why are these schools voting no?


TCU voting no because scared of competing with Houston.

OU voting no because they secretly want the Big12 to dissolve so they can go elsewhere.
Posted by DBU
Member since Mar 2014
19059 posts
Posted on 10/1/16 at 7:27 am to
They're voting no because adding UH provides no benefit to any of them.

Adding Uh would only have a negative impact on every program in that conference.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34431 posts
Posted on 10/1/16 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Why are these schools voting no?


Concerned about the Big 12 being watered down with mid-major programs.
Posted by Giant Leaf
On Leaf
Member since Nov 2015
4229 posts
Posted on 10/1/16 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Why are these schools voting no?



If I am God and was deciding things for the Big 12 they have to take Cincy to start.

Gets the tri-state area picking up Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana for your network and recruiting. Obviously Ohio is a big get top players come out of Cincy to OSU/Michigan all the time. Breaks the 100+ year stranglehold on the state OSU has had

After that you can take whoever the hell gets you the biggest market. Doesnt even matter
This post was edited on 10/1/16 at 9:02 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram