Started By
Message

re: Should NCAA grant Oklahoma State the victory?

Posted on 9/12/16 at 10:22 pm to
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35813 posts
Posted on 9/12/16 at 10:22 pm to
By far yes.

As I said before.

Colorado should have never split the natty based on 5 downs.

These aren't judgment calls. These aren't plays that happened earlier in the game.

These are...you failed to get a TD on 4th down...Colorado...your 5th down TD on the last play is nullified.

Cornell forfeited their game on a 5th down and it cost them the national championship.

I have Zero problem with nullifying last plays if they are wrong.

Earlier plays to reverse a game, no.

But in situations, where if it wasn't for idiots, a team would have never had the opportunity to score the winning points, then that doesn't count.

Why should it? Why should it?
This post was edited on 9/12/16 at 10:24 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76651 posts
Posted on 9/12/16 at 10:27 pm to
What about a judgement call that should have been overturned by today but a camera angle comes out later, a la 4th and goal from the one with one second left.

Do you review it with the new angle?
Posted by jlu03
San Diego
Member since Jul 2012
3321 posts
Posted on 9/13/16 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Colorado should have never split the natty based on 5 downs


I know players from the CU team that were very close with the refs and the refs families. Just saying....
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram