Started By
Message

re: Caller to Miles "You were 3-for-8 for 38 yards, how was that efficient"

Posted on 9/8/16 at 6:54 am to
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 6:54 am to
quote:

Is that how he seriously answered and defended his comments on the passing game?



Yes. He said 'I said we were passing well because IF we completed more...picked up more yards...we'd have been efficient'
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 6:57 am to
quote:

Yes. He said 'I said we were passing well because IF we completed more...picked up more yards...we'd have been efficient'


I'm not really surprised but the guy has a total disconnect in reality of college football now.
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
11200 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 7:09 am to
quote:

Is that how he seriously answered and defended his comments on the passing game?


Yes. He said 'I said we were passing well because IF we completed more...picked up more yards...we'd have been efficient'




Jesus, he sounds like he's effectively given up and is just waiting for the axe to fall. Of course thinking about it I really don't know how you explain that debacle Saturday.
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
69365 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 6:33 pm to
quote:

Yes. He said 'I said we were passing well because IF we completed more...picked up more yards...we'd have been efficient'





After rewatching several times, Harris wasn't really that bad on his throws. Dupre, the supposed elite 1st round draft pick, stunk. I mean fricking sucked.

I just don't know what play calls y'all want to run when the ones called only didn't work because the wr dropped it.




first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram