Started By
Message

re: Defense Question

Posted on 9/4/16 at 9:45 am to
Posted by TheFlyingTiger
Member since Oct 2009
4012 posts
Posted on 9/4/16 at 9:45 am to
the defense is the reason we didn't lose 41-14.

dave aranda and his D is the shiny part of this turd.

A couple of tackling problems, yes, but for the most part the D did its job. being on the field the whole game will make any defense a little softer, but these guys held up very well.

a guy like valentine, his job in the 3-4 is to eat up multiple linemen, allowing for those OLB and Safety blitzes, 1 on 1s with RB's, overloaded sides etc.

fill their zone block with 1 guy and there are 2 that can attack.

Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
21979 posts
Posted on 9/4/16 at 9:49 am to
quote:

being on the field the whole game


being on the field the whole time is the result of two things:

1- offense going 3 and out (or a turnover)
2- THE DEFENSE NOT MAKING THE OTHER OFFENSE GO 3 AND OUT (or a turnover)
This post was edited on 9/4/16 at 9:51 am
Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
21979 posts
Posted on 9/4/16 at 9:50 am to
quote:

1 on 1s with RB's,


ok..........go to a practice and tell your r.b. that he will go one on one with a linebacker.

I promise you that....out of 10 runs (one on one), the r.b. will juke that linebacker out of his jock on 8 attempts.

Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 9/4/16 at 9:53 am to
quote:

being on the field the whole game



cm'on man, be real. The D is part of that equation. They made stops when Wisky's QB made a bone headed decision. And that was pretty much it. LSU did lead in the last 4 minutes until Wisky drove right down the field for a long FG.


Again it was a Total Team Collapse
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram