- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/6/17 at 6:08 pm to GeauxColonels
I like the idea of moving up still. I just lost one of Europe's most creative midfielders over the past few seasons, and it would suck to just be out one of my top two picks for almost half a season. Bleed almost lost Diego Costa. Would suck if he didn't have a chance to replace Costa if he left.
Obviously I benefit in this instance, so I don't think my vote should really count. I can see GC's frustration, though. Maybe we should make it to where you only get to move up if the player is picked in the first 2 or 3 rounds or something?
Obviously I benefit in this instance, so I don't think my vote should really count. I can see GC's frustration, though. Maybe we should make it to where you only get to move up if the player is picked in the first 2 or 3 rounds or something?
This post was edited on 2/6/17 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 2/6/17 at 6:39 pm to GeauxColonels
I think the literal interpretation would say that you only get compensated for a top five round pick.
However, the change to the pick compensation rules occurred during an active season (after the draft begun I believe). With that in mind, I think both Jackwoods and the Mick should move up. In future seasons, you would only get compensated for losing a top five round pick.
Since GC would be most penalized by this ruling, do you think that you should pick first, second (Jackwoods first), or third (Jackwoods and the Mick first and second)?
However, the change to the pick compensation rules occurred during an active season (after the draft begun I believe). With that in mind, I think both Jackwoods and the Mick should move up. In future seasons, you would only get compensated for losing a top five round pick.
Since GC would be most penalized by this ruling, do you think that you should pick first, second (Jackwoods first), or third (Jackwoods and the Mick first and second)?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News