Started By
Message

re: Normandy Church Terror: ISIS Slits Throat of Preist and Takes Nuns Hostage

Posted on 7/26/16 at 1:43 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65098 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

What gets me about the liberals on here apologizing for our president and the Democratic nominee by saying, "Well, it's not a flood. It's only 65,000 a year. Plus, they're vetted" is why are we even taking a single one? At all? Can you give me a compelling reason when there's ample evidence across Europe what this leads to?

Also, let's be clear. There is no vetting process. That's a pipe dream and merely lip service this administration throws out there to give themselves cover.


And why do we need to bring them here anyway? I'm all for helping helpless women and children. But why can't we do that via refugee camps set up in safe areas? UN refugee camps have been the norm in situations like this since WWII. So why now all of a sudden do we import them here by the tens of thousands instead of setting up refugee camps over there so they can easily go home once it's all over? Or is the intention that they'll never go home? And if that's the case, that leads to one question... Why?
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79518 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 1:56 pm to
I'm not disagreeing with your question.

That said, the ideal is if we can help out some number of vetted women/children/families who are looking for our way of life.

Refugee camps are a breeding ground for radicalization, so not sure that is helpful, but keeping them somewhere else if we're unsure of our vetting procedure is fair.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram